Back

Flight 175

 

Before we start, here is some TV news fakery that everyone will accept:

Why will they believe it?
Because they heard about it on the news, that's why.

 

911 TV Fakery Contradictory Footage:

 
Find more videos like this on i-Openers

 

Proof of planned media involvement in events of 911

SCRIPTED NEWSREADING

 


Proof of planned media involvement in events of 911

Look for the missing planes!

Notice the genuine backdrop, showing the water etc. in the shots without planes, and the homogenous background used for the fake shots.

 

911 synchronised live news broadcast


911 synchronised live news broadcast


 

Before you accept the concept of planes entering buildings, make sure you know what those buildings were made of:

 

 

30% glass, 70% steel

The depth of the window openings was 1.98m.
The depth of the spandrel panels between the windows (floor spaces) was 1.32m.
So vertically, for every 3.3m, 1.32m of that total area is steel spandrel plate, reinforced being welded to the box columns and by steel floor pans (thickness unknown) and a 4" poured concrete floor.

1.32 / 3.3 x 100 = 40

40 percent of the tower's surface area was steel spandrel plate, reinforced being welded to the 18" box columns spaced 19" apart and by steel floor pans (thickness unknown) and a 4" poured concrete floor.

For the remaining 60% of the surface area, where the windows were, there were box columns with the spaces in between them being the window openings.

The box columns were 450mm cross-section, and the window openings were 480mm wide.

So for the windowed area:

450 / 930 x 100 = 48.3

48.3% of that area was steel box column, and 51.7% was window opening (glass, you say).


We have already calculated tat the windowed area was 60% of the surface area of the building, so:

51.7 x 0.6 = 31.02

We can say that the surface area of the outer walls was around 30% glass, 70% structural steel.

And 50% of that steel surface area was box column.

So (simply):

30% glass.

35% steel spandrel plate, reinforced being welded to the box columns and by steel floor pans (thickness unknown) and a 4" poured
concrete floor.

35% box column.

The thinnest steel used was 1/4" thick.

The lightest of these 3-floor sections weighed 6 tons.

Each section covered the area of six window openings, so then for the lightest sections at the top there was one ton of structural  (not mild) steel per window.


 

 

Plane reality test

 


Plane reality test


A look at a WTC outer wall section

 


WTC outer wall

 


WTC core

 


Building the World Trade Centre

 

And make sure you know how tough an airliner is:

 

Crash Physics for everyone

 

Simpler- How do the WTC plane crashes violate Newton's 3rd law of motion?

 

 

This photo shows how fragile a nose cone is:

And the speed of impact makes no difference to the fact that both objects always receive the same force:

More pictures related to the plane controversy

 

Flight 175 speed challenge- impossible speed

 

 

 

Stanley Prainmath and his amazing desk!

 

 

 

Plane reality test

Can you spot the fakes?


 

 

 

 

Look at the impossible image above, cut from a video shown by CNN on the night of September 11! The front of the plane has vanished into the building like a ghost, without making a ripple in the face of the building!

There is an area between the fuselage and the left engine where the wing has vanished yet the wall there is completely intact!

And the left section of the tail is missing.

Here is the video:


Use the pause button

 

Jeff from "pumpitout.com" calls the person who allegedly filmed this shot

 

 

A plane could never fit through the holes that we were shown, even in bits.

 

CARMEN TAYLOR AND MEDIA COMPLICITY

 

 

False images were broadcast live as scripts were read out to terrify us all into submission to the War of terror.

Look at how this still from the live broadcast of "the 2nd hit", which shows the impossible: The fragile nose cone of the aircraft is seen emerging completely intact from the "exit" side of the building! Immediately the screen went black and when the image reappeared the nose cone had vanished. This was apparently real-time CGI cock up, although there are reasons to believe that this video was also pre-prepared. If taken as genuine, it implicates the media.

= "The silver bullet".
Even if fake, as it was broadcast in "real time", it implicates the media:

 

Pinocchio's nose proves the lie

 

The impossible indestructible vanishing nose cone:

 

Here is "chopper 5" being called over the radio by someone who had just been interviewed as an "eyewitness":

 

The guy who calls him had just been interviewed as "a witness in Hoboken". Here is the live broadcast, he says "Very nice chopper 5" at 3:43, after the "hit shot" and you can hear his mic feed get cut:

("Freidl" calls chopper 5 over the radio just after the 2nd hit. His interview ends at 2:32, the 2nd hit is at 304. "Freidl" can be heard commenting "another plane" and "Oh my god", and then he makes the radio call which I think is "very nice chopper 5 anybody on?" at 3:40.)

 

 

The atrocious shot was replayed around 5pm:

 

Here is an interview with the camera operator from chopper 5, who says "anything's possible"!:

 

There was no "exit" hole in the NIST images, by the way:

 

And this reporter on the ground in NY says there was no plane:

 

"It was a bomb. Who said 2nd plane?":


 

There was a commercial-class plane flying around for people to see and hear, it is often referred to as "the white elephant".

This confused witness saw the fly-by plane as the tower exploded:

 


 

Here's a single sample of the multitude of errors that have been found in the 911 videos:

 

 

 

The greatest 911 "video mashup" of all time:

Oh my goodness!

From Genghis 6199

 

 

More fake 911 plane crash video:

 

Evan fairbanks:

 

Listen to Fairbanks try to defend his fake video: