Crash Physics for everyone
Fighting super-criminals- Exposing their crimes
Impossible images and a ghostplane
Why no planes could have struck the towers
|
The depth of the window openings was 1.98m. The lightest of these 3-floor sections weighed 6 tons.
Each section covered the area of six window openings, so then for the
lightest sections at the top there was one ton of
structural (not mild) steel per window. |
There were no crash physics evident at any of the three sites where planes
are supposed to have struck AND PENETRATED buildings.
For the plane for instance to have penetrated the tower, you must assume that it
remained intact going through the outer wall.
It is obvious to everyone that whatever, the planes did not smash to pieces and
fall into the street.
I will deal with this first.
REACTION/deflection
"For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction".
That means that the force received by both objects in a collision will be equal.
Now what determines how much force goes into the objects? Well, if one of the
objects penetrates the other, the force needed to break through the penetrated
object will be the amount of force received by EACH object.
If you add up the total sum of the forces required to "punch" through all of the
beams we are told that the plane went through, then you would have to say that
the plane sustained that amount of force and did not break up.
These beams were 18 inch cross-section box beams made of steel that at the top
of the towers, where they were the thinnest, was 1/4 inch thick.
They were constructed in 3-storey tall sections and were fitted together
in a staggered fashion for strength.
The lightest of these sections weighed 6 tons:
I contend that the plane would break up with much less force than what it would
take to penetrate all those outer wall beams.
I contend that a plane would break up if it collided with one of those outer wall sections alone that was suspended from a crane.
Any remaining kinetic energy remaining after the destruction of the various structures would be retained in any parts that had penetrated
the wall and parts that had fragmented, the fragments undergoing a deflective
process with their remaining energy, sending debris backwards from the impact area.
Some of the energy would convert to sound, heat and light.
The heat would ignite any fuel spilled from the wings, a large amount of which
would be vaporised instantly with the impact.
Then there is
TERMINAL BALLISTICS.
If the plane were made of tungsten or something, and it remained intact, then
upon the nose penetrating the first beams, whatever force that took would be
transmitted from the beams to the nose of the plane also, causing deceleration
and deflection.
The heavier part of the aircraft (the engines) has more momentum though, and due
to the deflection of the nose, the plane would tumble, in the same way a rifle
bullet tumbles through Kevlar.
AERODYNAMICS.
The tumble would occur in the direction of lift from the wings and tail plane.
The deceleration of the wing surfaces would not cause an instant loss of lift
because the lift is due to low air pressure above the top surface of the wing,
there would be enough lift left during an impact to determine the direction of
tumble.
And the 2nd plane was depicted as banking to the left when it hit the tower, so
it would have been rising to the left when it struck, giving us another,
separate reason for the plane to tumble.
With the diagonal rise of the nose being suddenly stopped upon penetrating the
building, the rear of the plane should have continued diagonally upwards,
causing it to tumble roof-on into the building, probably right-wing first due to
the extra lift on that side due to the bank of the aircraft, the wing on the
outside moving faster.
And as the bank of the plane means it should have been moving up and to the left
then the fuel should have continued in that direction when the tanks ruptured,
rather than go straight through any hole made by the impact.
